As an educator it really bothers me that Mark Edmundson
is offended by the notion that professors might learn from their students. Yes,
I am the content specialist in my classroom and as such usually know a lot more
about my subject than my students, but I would argue that if you are not
learning from your students then you are doing it wrong. Education is not just
about transferring chunks of information from one head (yours) to another (your
students). That is an outmoded and ineffective model and one of the things wrong
with education today. Education is about exploring ideas and if you are not
giving students the opportunity to explore, understand, apply, and share in
your class then you are missing out and, worse, you are cheating your students.
Edmundson then goes on to ask the question: Can online
education ever be education of the very best sort? This is a valid question and
one we should continue to ask, but what irks me is the assumption that a
lecture class is the gold standard by which education should be measured. Just
this week Cathy Davidson argued that “If
we profs can be replaced by a computer screen, we should be.” She makes
many excellent points about the need for education reform and how/why online
education will be a major player in that reform but she also points out that
lectures are an economic expedient but not good pedagogy. Davidson points out lectures may (if done well by the expert performers Edmundson lauds) be entertaining,
but research shows students do not retain information presented in this format
or understand how to apply it. Just yesterday Matt Reed agreed with Davidson
and noted that lecture has never been “a
particularly effective way to teach.” Online classes can be and are
designed and taught in similarly ineffective ways all around the world, but as
Davidson and Reed point out there is also great potential for innovation in
both the traditional classroom and the online classroom if we adapt to new
circumstances and knowledge and employ new strategies and new tools. Whether we
like it or not, times are changing and we
profs need to reform and “turn
into the skid” or the university will indeed be torn apart as Edmundson so
fears. The fault will not be with online education but will instead be with
profs (and institutions) that refuse to evolve and grow.
The idea that Edmundson presented which really made my
blood boil is that an online class cannot be a genuine intellectual community
because it is a monologue rather than a dialogue (ironic much?). He goes on to
describe online education as anonymous, sterile, abstract, and lonely. I
thought my head my spin off my shoulders after reading this opinion which was
apparently formed after watching a pre-filmed online class. Well, of course
that model of online education is not as rich as the live lecture (which is
already pretty ineffective) but apparently Edmundson is not aware of the
tremendously rich and varied pedagogy taking place around the world that
harnesses the power of technology to make online and blended classes exciting
and challenging places to learn. It makes me wonder how Edmundson would respond
if his students present such a poorly supported argument.
I would urge anyone who questions the exciting class
design possible in online and blended classes to visit such collectives as HASTAC and Hybrid Pedagogy to find overwhelming
support to counter the idea that online education is anonymous, sterile,
abstract, and lonely. I strive to make my classes an interactive community with
dynamic, collaborative projects and my class activities and assignments are constantly
evolving inspired by the amazing work being done by my friends, peers, and
colleagues around the world. This is an exciting time to be an educator and I
believe our students are enriched by the experience. Sometimes my class
activities and assignments don’t work out as planned (or hoped) but then that
was true when I taught face-to-face. Often my online space is messy but then so
was my traditional class space – we were often loud too. But this week, our
first week of classes at my institution, we have begun building a community. I
shared personal tidbits about my hobbies, family, and dog and invited students
to share as well. As we interact as a group, we have talked about favorite
books, movies, TV shows, and video games as well as tattoos, crafts, and pets.
We are finding out who is creative, who is nervous about technology, and who is
incredibly busy. After only three days, 22 students have posted more than 150
messages to each other in our Community forum. Sure I have included some
prerecorded videos to explain assignments but there are no lectures. Instead we
will continue to share, discuss, challenge, and question – and I know that I
will learn from my students just as they learn from me and from each other. I
don’t know how Edmundson defines a “genuine intellectual community” but I’m
pretty sure we’ve got one going on and I know we are not alone.






