I’ve spent a lot of time
this summer reading about organizational communication research, theory, and
trends in preparation for beginning work on my study of the National Writing Project
and the Morehead Writing Project in particular. I am interested in the ways
that the Morehead Writing Project reinvented its organization and transformed
from an organization in crisis to a successful enterprise. However, the recent
changes in national education funding have also forced the National Writing
Project to reinvent itself and reorganize. I believe this is an area of
research that could be very interesting to pursue.
As I lay the groundwork
for this study and plan my future projects, I do want to carefully think about
a number of key terms and one of those is organizational communication. What
exactly is organizational communication and why do I want to study it?
Organizational
communication focuses on the role of communication in organizational life.
Communication is essential to all organizations whatever their purpose, size,
or goals. Social constructionists believe that communication creates the form
and shape of an organization. Certainly communication serves to maintain and
sustain relationships within and with the organization and its members and
constituencies, but it is complex and in order for organizations and members to
survive and succeed it is important to understand the communication process of
the organization and that is where organizational communication enters.
Communication helps
organize people to effectively live and/or work together. Organizational
communication can identify and remove barriers to communication through formal
exchange of information as well as more informal interactions. According to Jones,
organizations, or groups of individuals working together in a coordinated way
in pursuit of specific goals, require communication to plan, communicate, and
pursue these goals. Jones argues that organizations do not exist without
communication. Te’eni
describes organizations as entities engaged in social and economic exchange and
agrees that communication is the foundation for organizational action. Te’eni
relies on Habermas for the purposes of that communication: reaching
understanding, coordinating action, building relationships, and Influencing
others. Deetz
maintains that communication
practices can be used to help coordinate and control the activities of
organizational members and relations with external constituencies. Richmond et al
describe organizational communication as a dynamic process by which individuals
generate, cultivate and/or shape the minds of others in a formal organization.
They argue that there are six functions of organizational communication: to
inform, regulate, integrate, manage, persuade, and socialize.
Traditionally, organizational
communication focused more on business and ways to improve production, but in
more recent decades the focus has shifted to study aspects of organizational
life that can improve the lives of organizational members as well as the
organization. In addition, the types of organizations under study are much more
varied. Organizational communication can include the study of how individuals
use communication to work out the tension between working within the
constraints of pre-existing organizational structures and promoting change
within that organization. This is exactly the place where my research interests
lie and I can’t wait to embark on my journey of discovery.
An examination of organizational narrative (start search with David Boje on this topic) could also help you answer your research question in interesting ways. I'm looking at the communications of autism organizations drawing from Boje's *Narrative Methods for Organizational & Communication Research* for my narrative analysis now.
ReplyDelete